沉浸-反思问卷在中国大学生中的应用

原琳，彭明，黄俊红，周仁来

中国临床心理学杂志2010 年第18 卷第6期:701-703

【摘要】目的：本文旨在将沉浸-反思问卷（Rumination-Reflection  Questionnaire，RRQ）引入中国，并考察其在中国大学生样本中的信度和效度。方法：在6 所高校中随机抽取1226  名大学生完成测试，并在两周后对其中的150 人进行重测。结果：①验证性因子分析显示，沉浸-反思两因子模型具有良好的结构效  度，NNFI=0.974，IFI=0.978，CFI=0.978，RMSEA=0.077； ②沉浸-反思问卷具有良好的项目鉴别度；  ③总量表的Cronbach’s α 系数为0.860， 其中，  沉浸为0.810，反思为0.837；④总量表的重测信度为0.657，其中，沉浸的为0.707，反思的为0.459；⑤沉浸与大五人格中N  因素神经质呈正相关，反思与O  因素开放性呈正相关；⑥沉浸与反思分量表均无性别差异。结论：沉浸-反思问卷中文版的信、效度达到测量学要求。
【关键词】沉浸-反思问卷； 自我关注； 神经质；  开放性

The Chinese Version of Rumination-reflection  Questionnaire
in College Students: Validity and Reliability
YUAN Lin， PENG  Ming， HUANG Jun-hong， ZHOU Ren-lai
Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental  Psychology (Beijing Normal University)，Beijing 100875， China

【Abstract】Objective： To measure the validity and  reliability of the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire applied in Chinese  college students. Methods： 1226 college students from 6 distinct universities  participated, and 150 of them were retest after two weeks. Results： ①In  confirmatory analysis, NNFI=0.974, IFI=0.978, CFI=0.978, MSEA=0.077; ②Both  rumination and reflection factors had acceptable item discrimination;  ③Cronbach’s α coefficients of RRQ was 0.860, of which rumination was 0.810 and  reflection was 0.837; ④Test-retest reliability of RRQ was 0.657, of which  rumination was 0.707 and reflection was 0.459 （all Ps<0.001）; ⑤Rumination had  significant correlation with neuroticism, while reflection had significant  correlation with openness; ⑥There were no gender difference in both rumination  and reflection. Conclusion：The Chinese version of rumination-reflection  questionnaire had acceptable psychometric quality.
【Key  words】Rumination-reflection questionnaire； Self-focused attention； Neuroticism；  Openness

NewsImage/2012410232310.pdf